tertiary-treatment.com
Assess Your Plant
Chemical phosphorus dosing system at a wastewater treatment plant with reagent storage tanks

Chemical Phosphorus Removal for Tertiary Treatment

Precipitation with iron or aluminium salts — the workhorse of phosphorus compliance.

Chemical phosphorus precipitation is the most widely used method for achieving the stringent TP limits set by the revised EU Directive (typically less than 1.0 mg/L, or less than 0.5 mg/L for large plants). It works by dosing a metal salt — usually ferric chloride (FeCl₃) or poly-aluminium chloride (PAC) — to convert dissolved phosphorus into insoluble particles that are then captured by a downstream filter. The technology is simple, proven, and can be added to virtually any existing plant as a standalone dosing station with minimal civil works. It is the essential complement to any tertiary filtration system targeting phosphorus removal.

Key Numbers

<0.0
mg/L
Achievable TP (with filtration)
0
%
Typical P removal efficiency
0.00
€/m³
Avg. chemical cost
0
months
Typical installation time

Common Reagents

Ferric Chloride (FeCl₃)

Dose: 5–15 mg Fe/L as FeForm: Liquid (40 % w/w)

+ Most widely used; reliable; works across pH range

Note: Produces iron-coloured sludge; may stain equipment

Aluminium Sulphate (Alum)

Dose: 5–12 mg Al/L as AlForm: Liquid or granular

+ Lighter sludge colour; effective at pH 5.5–7.5

Note: Narrower effective pH range; residual aluminium limits

Poly-Aluminium Chloride (PAC)

Dose: 3–8 mg Al/L as AlForm: Liquid

+ Pre-polymerised — faster floc formation; lower dose; less sludge

Note: Higher unit cost per kg Al; best for polishing applications

Ferric Sulphate (Fe₂(SO₄)₃)

Dose: 5–15 mg Fe/L as FeForm: Liquid or granular

+ Alternative to FeCl₃ where chloride limits apply

Note: Less common; may need longer floc maturation

Engineering Insight: Dose Optimisation

Over-dosing wastes chemicals and increases sludge; under-dosing risks non-compliance. Modern dosing systems use online phosphate analysers (feed-forward control) combined with effluent feedback to optimise the dose in real time. This typically reduces chemical consumption by 15–25 % compared to fixed-dose operation.

Dosing Point Comparison

Pre-secondary clarifier (simultaneous)

P removed in existing sludge; no extra infrastructure

Best for: Plants with moderate TP targets (1–2 mg/L)

Post-secondary / pre-tertiary filter

Dissolved P precipitated + captured on tertiary filter

Best for: Plants targeting TP less than 0.5 mg/L; most common retrofit approach

Two-point dosing (both locations)

Primary dose in biology + polishing dose ahead of filter

Best for: Plants with very high P loads or stringent efficiency requirements (≥90 %)

Regulatory Context

The revised EU Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (2024/3019) sets TP limits of 1.0 mg/L for plants 10,000–150,000 PE and 0.5 mg/L for plants above 150,000 PE, or removal efficiencies of 87.5–90 %. Chemical precipitation combined with tertiary filtration is the standard engineering approach to meet these targets.

Ready to upgrade your treatment plant?

Get a preliminary engineering assessment tailored to your plant’s specific conditions and requirements.

Assess Your Plant

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Content

Last reviewed: August 2026. Regulatory requirements may vary by national implementation. This content is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal or engineering advice.