tertiary-treatment.com
Assess Your Plant
Tertiary filtration media system polishing secondary effluent at a wastewater treatment plant

Tertiary Filtration for Wastewater Treatment

The filtration stage that turns biologically treated effluent into discharge- or reuse-ready water — and how to choose between disc, cloth, sand and membrane filters.

Tertiary filtration is the polishing step that removes the residual suspended solids and particulate phosphorus left in secondary (biologically treated) effluent. It is the single most common building block of a tertiary treatment stage, because meeting the tightening EU limits for total phosphorus and suspended solids almost always requires a filter. The four filtration technologies used in practice — disc filtration, cloth media filtration, sand filtration and membrane filtration — all reduce TSS to around or below 10 mg/L, but they differ sharply in footprint, energy use, achievable quality and cost. The right choice depends on your target effluent, available space, flow and whether you also need phosphorus polishing or reuse-quality water. A short structured plant assessment turns those inputs into a concrete shortlist.

Key Numbers

<0
mg/L
Typical TSS after filtration
<0.0
mg/L
Achievable TP (filter + dosing)
0
options
Core filtration technologies
0
Min. footprint (disc filter)

Where tertiary filtration fits

Tertiary filtration sits between the secondary (biological) stage and final discharge or reuse. Secondary treatment removes most dissolved organic load, but it leaves behind fine suspended solids and the particulate phosphorus bound to them. A tertiary filter captures that residual material, and — where dissolved phosphorus is the constraint — works together with an upstream chemical dosing step that converts dissolved phosphorus into a filterable precipitate.

Because so much of the remaining phosphorus and solids load is particulate, filtration is the workhorse of the tertiary stage. For most plants facing the new EU limits, choosing and sizing the right filter is the central engineering decision of the whole upgrade.

The four filtration technologies compared

Disc Filtration

high

Rotating disc filters with fine-mesh or woven media — the smallest footprint and lowest energy of any tertiary filter. Ideal where space is tight and influent solids are moderate.

Footprint: Very small (15–25 m²)
Energy: Very low
Complexity: Low
Advantages
  • Smallest footprint of all filters
  • Near-zero energy (gravity feed)
  • No building required
  • Modular and easy to retrofit
Limitations
  • TSS and particulate P only
  • Not for high-solids influent
  • Chemical dosing needed for TP

Cloth Media Filtration

high

Pile-cloth (textile) discs that polish suspended solids and particulate phosphorus. Very compact and a frequent fastest-win retrofit, closely related to disc filtration.

Footprint: Small
Energy: Low
Complexity: Low
Advantages
  • Very compact footprint
  • Low energy
  • Proven retrofit track record
  • Good particulate P capture
Limitations
  • Media replacement over time
  • Dissolved P needs dosing
  • Sensitive to grease/oil loads

Sand Filtration

medium

Robust depth filtration — including continuous-backwash designs — that reliably removes solids. A proven, forgiving workhorse where footprint is less constrained.

Footprint: Medium–large
Energy: Medium
Complexity: Medium
Advantages
  • Very robust and forgiving
  • Handles variable influent well
  • Long, proven service life
Limitations
  • Larger footprint than disc/cloth
  • Higher head loss / energy
  • More civil works to retrofit

Membrane Filtration (MF/UF)

medium

Micro- or ultrafiltration membranes that provide a near-complete solids and pathogen barrier, producing reuse-quality effluent where standards go beyond nutrient removal.

Footprint: Medium
Energy: High
Complexity: High
Advantages
  • Highest effluent quality
  • Pathogen barrier — reuse ready
  • Very consistent output
Limitations
  • Highest energy and cost
  • Fouling management required
  • More operator attention

Engineering Insight: match the filter to the constraint

If space is the binding constraint, disc or cloth media filtration usually wins. If the influent is variable or high-solids, sand filtration is more forgiving. If you need reuse-quality water or a pathogen barrier, membrane filtration is the answer. Where phosphorus is the target, any filter is paired with upstream chemical dosing. Getting this match right at the assessment stage avoids costly rework later.

For Existing Plants

Most tertiary filtration is added as a retrofit rather than a new build. Compact disc and cloth filters slot into the existing hydraulic profile with minimal civil works and can be installed while the plant keeps running. Use our free Plant Assessment Tool to see which filter fits your flow, space and effluent target.

Why filtration is becoming unavoidable

Under the revised EU Urban Wastewater Directive (2024/3019), tertiary treatment for nutrient removal becomes mandatory for most larger plants (above 150,000 PE by 2033, above 10,000 PE by 2036). Because a large share of total phosphorus and residual solids is particulate, a tertiary filter is normally required to reach the new TP (around 0.5 mg/L for large plants) and TSS limits.
Source: Directive (EU) 2024/3019

Ready to upgrade your treatment plant?

Get a preliminary engineering assessment tailored to your plant’s specific conditions and requirements.

Assess Your Plant

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Content

Last reviewed: September 2026. Regulatory requirements may vary by national implementation. This content is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal or engineering advice.